Mono Blue Faeries - Deck Analysis 30-08-2026

Summary Statistics

14
Decks Analyzed

7d
Days Analyzed

31
Unique Cards

8
Universal (≥95%)

15
Staples (≥75%)

4
Flex Options

36.0
Consistency Score

Deck Diversity Analysis

Distribution of cards by presence tier. Higher diversity means more flexible deckbuilding options.

Cards most frequently present in the mainboard across analyzed decklists.

Cards most frequently present in the sideboard across analyzed decklists.

When a card is included, how many copies are typically played? This view uses the combined card statistics like the original report.

MB/SB Comparison

Delta view of cross-role cards only: positive values on the right mean the card is more common in sideboards, while negative values on the left mean it is more common in mainboards.

Card Copy Consistency

Card copy consistency with error bars showing standard deviation across decks. Smaller bars mean more stable copy counts.

Mainboard Staples (75%+)

Core cards that define this archetype. These should almost always be in your deck.

Card Name	Presence Rate	Avg Copies	Std Dev	Total Copies	Appears in Decks
Counterspell	100.0%	4.00	0.00	56	14
Faerie Miscreant	100.0%	4.00	0.00	56	14
Faerie Seer	100.0%	4.00	0.00	56	14
Moon-circuit Hacker	100.0%	4.00	0.00	56	14
Ninja Of The Deep Hours	100.0%	4.00	0.00	56	14
Spellstutter Sprite	100.0%	4.00	0.00	56	14
Of One Mind	100.0%	3.93	0.27	55	14
Brinebarrow Intruder	92.9%	3.85	0.55	50	13
Sewer-veillance Cam	92.9%	3.00	0.00	39	13
Cryoshatter	85.7%	3.50	0.67	42	12
Harrier Strix	85.7%	1.83	0.39	22	12
Dispel	78.6%	1.18	0.40	13	11

Core Mainboard Cards (50-74%)

Important cards that appear in most builds but aren't universal. Strong considerations for your deck.

No cards with presence rate between 50.0% and 75.0%

Flex Mainboard Cards (10-49%)

Cards that reflect tuning, preference, and local metagame choices.

Card Name	Presence Rate	Avg Copies	Total Copies	Appears in Decks
Snap	21.4%	2.67	8	3
Humbling Elder	14.3%	3.00	6	2
Unable To Scream	14.3%	2.50	5	2

Cross-Role Cards

New analysisCards that appear in both mainboard and sideboard across different lists, indicating strategic flexibility.

Card Name	Main %	Side %	Main Avg	Side Avg	Main Decks	Side Decks
Cryoshatter	85.7%	28.6%	3.50	0.42	12	4
Dispel	78.6%	71.4%	1.00	1.00	11	10

Sideboard Tech Cards

New analysisCards with strong sideboard adoption (> 20%) and little or no mainboard use.

Card Name	Main %	Side %	Side Avg	Side Decks
Blue Elemental Blast	0.0%	100.0%	3.07	14
Hydroblast	0.0%	78.6%	3.00	11
Annul	0.0%	78.6%	2.64	11
Steel Sabotage	0.0%	71.4%	3.00	10
Relic Of Progenitus	0.0%	64.3%	2.11	9
Spreading Seas	0.0%	50.0%	3.71	7
Envelop	0.0%	21.4%	1.67	3

Silver Bullets

New analysisLow-copy (< 20%), sideboard-only answers.

Card Name	Side %	Side Avg	Side Decks
Gut Shot	7.1	3.00	1
Azure Fleet Admiral	7.1	1.00	1
Echoing Truth	7.1	1.00	1
Faerie Macabre	7.1	1.00	1

Created by Cia91 - Version 4.12
It contains unofficial Fan Content permitted under the Fan Content Policy. Not approved/endorsed by Wizards. Portions of the materials used are property of Wizards of the Coast LLC.